This is an extract from my personal notes and public etherpads from the OpenStack PTG 2017 in Denver. A lot of text ahead!
This part covers Pike recap and retrospective, status updates and CI work.
Status of Pike priorities
In the Pike cycle, we had 22 priority items. Quite a few planned priorities did land completely, despite the well-known staffing problems.
Booting from cinder volumes
This includes the iRMC implementation, but excludes the iLO one. There is also a nova patch for updating IP addresses for volume connectors on review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468353/.
Next, we need to update cinder to support FCoE - then we'll be able to support it in the generic PXE boot interface. Finally, there is some interest in implementing out-of-band BFV for UCS drivers too.
Rolling (online) upgrades between releases
We've found a bug that was backported to stable/pike soon after the release and now awaits a point release. We also need developer documentation and some post-Pike clean ups.
We also discussed fast-forward upgrades. We may need an explicit migration for VIFs from port.extra to port.internal_info, rloo will track this. Overall, we need to always make our migrations explicit and runnable without the services running.
The driver composition reform
Finished, with hardware types created for all supported hardware, and the classic drivers pending deprecation in Queens.
Removing the classic drivers is planned for Rocky.
Standalone jobs (jobs without nova)
These are present and voting, but we're not using their potential. The discussion is summarized below in Future development of our CI.
Feature parity between two CLI implementations
openstack baremetal CLI is now complete and preferred, with the
deprecation of the
ironic CLI expected in Queens.
We would like OSC to have less dependencies though. There were talks about
having a standalone
openstack command without dependencies on other
clients, only on
keystoneauth1. rloo will follow up here.
TheJulia will check if there are any implications from the interoperability team point of view.
Redfish hardware type
redfish hardware type now provides all the basic stuff we need, i.e.
power and boot device management. There is an ongoing effort to implement
inspection. It is unclear whether more features can be implemented in a
vendor-agnostic fashion; rpioso is looking into Dell, while crushil
is looking into Lenovo.
Also finished are:
Post-deploy VIF attach/detach.
Physical network awareness.
OSC default API version
We now issue a warning of no explicit version is provided to the CLI. The next step will be to change the version to latest, but our current definition of latest does not fit this goal really well. We use the latest version known to the client, which will prevent it from working out-of-box with older clouds. Instead, we need to finally implement API version negotiation in ironicclient, and negotiate the latest version.
Reference architectures guide
There is one patch that lays out considerations that are going to be shared between all proposed architectures. The use cases we would like to cover:
Admin-only provisioner (standalone architectures)
Small fleet and/or rare provisions.
Here a non-HA architecture may be acceptable, and a noop or flat networking can be used.
Large fleet or frequent provisions.
Here we will recommend HA and neutron networking. Noop networking is also acceptable.
Bare metal cloud for end users (with nova)
Smaller single-site cloud.
Non-HA architecture and flat or noop networking is acceptable. Ironic conductors can live on OpenStack controller nodes.
Large single-site cloud.
HA is required, and it is recommended to split ironic conductors with their TFTP/HTTP servers to separate machines. Neutron networking should be used, and thus compatible switches will be required, as well as their ML2 mechanism drivers.
It is preferred to use virtual media instead of PXE/iPXE for deployment and cleaning, if supported by hardware. Otherwise, especially large clouds may consider splitting away TFTP servers.
Large multi-site cloud.
The same as a single-site cloud plus using Cells v2.
We agreed to continue this effort, even though the ansible deploy driver solves some of its use cases. The crucial point is how to pass the requested deploy steps parameters from a user to ironic. For a non-standalone case it means passing them through nova.
In a discussion in the nova room we converged to an idea of introducing new CRUD API for deploy templates (the exact name to be defined) on the ironic side. Each such template will have a unique name and will correspond to a deploy step and a set of arguments for it. On the nova side, a trait can be requested with a name matching (in some sense) the name of a deploy template. It will be passed to ironic, and ironic will apply the action, specified in the template, during deployment.
The exact implementation and API will be defined in a spec, johnthetubaguy is writing it.
Routed network support is close to completion, we need to finish a patch for networking-baremetal.
The neutron event processing work is on a spec stage, but does not look controversial for now.
We also have patches up for deprecating DHCP providers and for making our DHCP code less dnsmasq-specific.
Preparation work is under way. We are making our PXE boot management pluggable, with a new implementation on review that manages a dnsmasq process directly, instead of changing iptables.
We seem to agree that rolling upgrades are not a priority for ironic-inspector, as it's never hit via end users either directly or through another service. It's a purely admin-only API, and admins can plan for a potential outage.
There is a proposal to support ironic boot interfaces instead of a home-grown implementation for boot management. The discussion of it launched a more global discussion about ironic-inspector future, that continued the next day.
Just Do It
The following former priorities have all or the most of patches up for review, and just require some attention:
IPA API versioning
Supported power states API
E-Tags in API
OpenStack goals status
We have not completed either of the two goals for the Pike cycle, and now we have two more goals to complete. All four goals are relatively close to completion.
We have a non-voting integration job on ironic and a voting functional test job on ironic-inspector. The missing steps are:
make the python 3 job voting on ironic
implement a job with IPA running on python 3 (blocked by pyudev weirdness)
create an integration job with python 3 for ironic-inspector (mostly blocked by swift, will have reduced coverage; an alternative is to try RadosGW)
Switching to uWSGI
Ironic standalone tests are running with mod_wsgi and voting, we only need to switch to uWSGI.
For ironic-inspector it's much more complicated: it does not have a separate API service for now at all. It's unclear if we'll able to just launch the current service as it is behind a WSGI container, as we actively use green threads. We have to probably wait until the HA work is done.
Splitting away the tempest plugin
We have a script to extract git history for a sub-tree. We need to create a separate git repository somewhere, so that we do not submit 60-80 related patches to zuul. Then this repository will be imported by the infra team, and we'll proceed with the migration.
On the previous (ATL) PTG we decided to have ironic and ironic-inspector plugins co-located. This will be less confusing for external users, as many of them to not understand the difference clearly, but it will also complicate the migration.
We will need to plan the actual migration in advance, and freeze the version in-tree for some time.
Policy in the code
The ironic part is essentially done, we just need to change the way we document policy: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/502519/.
No policy support exists in ironic-inspector, and it's unclear if this goal assumes adding it. There is a desire to do so anyway.
Future development of our CI
We have standalone tests voting, but we're not fully using their potential. In the end, we want to reduce the number of non-standalone jobs to:
a whole disk image job,
a partition images job,
a boot-from-volume job,
a multi-node job with advanced networking (can be merged with one of the first two),
two grenade jobs: full and partial.
The following tests can likely be part of the standalone job:
tests for all combinations of disk types and deploy methods,
tests covering all community-supported drivers (snmp, redfish),
tests on different boot options (local vs network boot),
tests on root device hints (we plan to cover serial number, wwn and size with operators),
Take over testing
The take over feature is very important for our HA model, but is completely untested. We discussed the two most important test cases:
conductor failure during deployment with node in
conductor failure for an active node using network boot.
We discussed two ways of implementing the test: using a multi-node job with two conductors or using only one conductor. The latter requires a trick: after killing the conductor, change its host name, so that it looks like a new conductor. In either case, we can combine both tests into one run:
start deploying two nodes with netboot:
The remaining steps will be repeated for both nodes.
Wait for nodes
Kill the conductor.
Manually clean up the files from the TFTP and HTTP directories and the master image cache.
Change the conductor host name in
Wait for directories to be populated again.
We should aim to remove this step eventually.
virsh startthe nodes to continue their deployment.
Wait for nodes to become
Here is where the second test starts:
Repeat steps 3 - 6.
virsh rebootthe nodes.
Check SSH connection to the rebooted instances.
In the future, we would also like to have negative tests on failed take over
for nodes in
deploying. We should also have similar tests for cleaning.
We've had a short retrospective. Positive items:
Weekly bug liaison (action: start doing it again),
Landed some big features
Acknowledge that vendors need more attention
Did not drive our PTL away :)
Not so positive:
Loss of people
Gate breakages (action: better hand off of current mitigation actions between timezones, report on IRC and the whiteboard what you've done and what's left)
Took too many priorities (action: take less, make the community understand that priorities != full backlog)
Still not enough attention to vendors (action: accept one patch per vendor as part of weekly priorities; the same for subteams)
Soft feature freeze
Need more folks reviewing (action: jlvillal considers picking up the weekly review call)
Releasing and cutting stable/pike was a mess (discussed in Release cycle)
No alignment between OpenStack releases and vendor hardware releases.
We had really hard time releasing Pike. Grenade was branched before us, essentially messing up our upgrade testing. We had to cut out stable/pike at a random point, and then backport quite a few features, after repairing the CI.
When discussing that, we noted that we committed to releasing often and early, but we'd never done it, at least not for ironic itself. Having regular releases can help us avoiding getting overloaded in the end of the cycle. We've decided:
Keep master as close to a releasable state as possible, including not exposing incomplete features to users and keeping release notes polished.
Release regularly, especially when we feel that something is ready to got out. Let us aim for releasing roughly once a month.
Let us cut stable/pike at the same time as the other projects. We will use the last released version as a basis for it.
We are going back to feature freeze at the same time as the other projects, two weeks before the branching at milestone 3. This will allow us to finish anything requiring finishing, particularly rolling upgrade preparation, documentation and release notes.